Compare

Zespan vs BrainTrust

Zespan vs BrainTrust — full observability vs eval-first tooling.

BrainTrust is strong on evaluations and dataset management — a good choice for teams whose primary workflow is prompt experimentation and offline evaluation. For production observability of deployed agents — real-time tracing, cost attribution, guardrails, incident management, and a conversational copilot — Zespan covers the full picture that BrainTrust does not.

Capability comparison: Zespan vs BrainTrust
CapabilityZespanBrainTrust
Production tracing✓ Full span waterfallLimited
Agent auto-discovery✓ Zero configNot available
Agent health scoring✓ A–F compositeNot available
Multi-agent delegationYesNot available
Evaluations✓ Auto + manual, 12 templates✓ Strong (core feature)
Dataset management✓ Trace-to-dataset✓ Strong (core feature)
Guardrails✓ 7 types, pre/postNot available
Cost management✓ Attribution + forecast + recsNot available
Incident management✓ Full lifecycleNot available
Natural language query✓ ZespanPilot NLQNot available
Alerts✓ Error, latency, cost, evalNot available

Pick Zespan when…

  • You're running agents in production and need real-time tracing, not just offline evals.
  • You need guardrails, runtime safety, or cost controls in production.
  • You want incident management and alerting alongside quality evaluations.
  • You want one platform for production observability and evaluation — not two tools.
  • You need agent monitoring: health scoring, delegation graphs, per-agent cost attribution.

Pick BrainTrust when…

  • Your primary workflow is offline prompt experimentation and dataset curation.
  • You don't yet have agents in production — you're in the experimentation phase.
  • You want the most opinionated eval-first workflow and BrainTrust's scoring UX.

Frequently asked

Does Zespan have strong evaluations like BrainTrust?

Yes. Zespan auto-evaluators run on every new trace with 12 built-in LLM-as-judge templates (correctness, faithfulness, toxicity, relevance, and more). Manual eval runs against datasets are also supported. Eval scores are queryable via ZespanPilot.

Can I do dataset management in Zespan?

Yes. Zespan supports named datasets with up to 500 items per call. You can create datasets from production traces with one click (trace-to-dataset), run batch simulations against them, and browse full run history.

What does Zespan offer that BrainTrust doesn't?

Production tracing with span waterfall, multi-agent delegation graphs, agent health scoring, guardrails (PII, toxicity, format, cost ceiling), cost forecasting, AI cost optimizer, incident management, alerts (eval + cost + latency), and ZespanPilot NLQ — all missing from BrainTrust's current feature set.

Try Zespan — free, no card needed

10K traces/month free. Setup takes under 5 minutes. See why teams switch from BrainTrust.

Get started free →