Compare
Zespan vs BrainTrust
Zespan vs BrainTrust — full observability vs eval-first tooling.
BrainTrust is strong on evaluations and dataset management — a good choice for teams whose primary workflow is prompt experimentation and offline evaluation. For production observability of deployed agents — real-time tracing, cost attribution, guardrails, incident management, and a conversational copilot — Zespan covers the full picture that BrainTrust does not.
| Capability | Zespan | BrainTrust |
|---|---|---|
| Production tracing | ✓ Full span waterfall | Limited |
| Agent auto-discovery | ✓ Zero config | Not available |
| Agent health scoring | ✓ A–F composite | Not available |
| Multi-agent delegation | Yes | Not available |
| Evaluations | ✓ Auto + manual, 12 templates | ✓ Strong (core feature) |
| Dataset management | ✓ Trace-to-dataset | ✓ Strong (core feature) |
| Guardrails | ✓ 7 types, pre/post | Not available |
| Cost management | ✓ Attribution + forecast + recs | Not available |
| Incident management | ✓ Full lifecycle | Not available |
| Natural language query | ✓ ZespanPilot NLQ | Not available |
| Alerts | ✓ Error, latency, cost, eval | Not available |
Pick Zespan when…
- You're running agents in production and need real-time tracing, not just offline evals.
- You need guardrails, runtime safety, or cost controls in production.
- You want incident management and alerting alongside quality evaluations.
- You want one platform for production observability and evaluation — not two tools.
- You need agent monitoring: health scoring, delegation graphs, per-agent cost attribution.
Pick BrainTrust when…
- Your primary workflow is offline prompt experimentation and dataset curation.
- You don't yet have agents in production — you're in the experimentation phase.
- You want the most opinionated eval-first workflow and BrainTrust's scoring UX.
Frequently asked
Does Zespan have strong evaluations like BrainTrust?
Yes. Zespan auto-evaluators run on every new trace with 12 built-in LLM-as-judge templates (correctness, faithfulness, toxicity, relevance, and more). Manual eval runs against datasets are also supported. Eval scores are queryable via ZespanPilot.
Can I do dataset management in Zespan?
Yes. Zespan supports named datasets with up to 500 items per call. You can create datasets from production traces with one click (trace-to-dataset), run batch simulations against them, and browse full run history.
What does Zespan offer that BrainTrust doesn't?
Production tracing with span waterfall, multi-agent delegation graphs, agent health scoring, guardrails (PII, toxicity, format, cost ceiling), cost forecasting, AI cost optimizer, incident management, alerts (eval + cost + latency), and ZespanPilot NLQ — all missing from BrainTrust's current feature set.
Try Zespan — free, no card needed
10K traces/month free. Setup takes under 5 minutes. See why teams switch from BrainTrust.
Get started free →