Compare
Zespan vs LangSmith
Zespan vs LangSmith — agent-first vs chain-first observability.
LangSmith is the best tool if your entire stack is LangChain/LangGraph and your team is comfortable with its per-seat pricing. Outside that ecosystem it becomes friction-heavy — no auto-discovery, poor UX for CrewAI or AutoGen agents, and no AI-powered cost optimization. Zespan is built agent-first and works across every major framework from day one.
| Capability | Zespan | LangSmith |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | 10K traces/month | 5K traces/month |
| Starting price | $39/month | $39/seat/month |
| Framework support | Any framework + OTel | Best for LangChain/LangGraph |
| Agent auto-discovery | ✓ 2 lines, zero config | Not available |
| Multi-agent delegation graph | Yes | Limited (LangGraph only) |
| Agent health scoring | ✓ A–F composite score | Not available |
| LLM-as-judge auto-evals | ✓ 12 templates, automatic | Manual only |
| AI cost optimizer | ✓ 30-day forecast + recs | Not available |
| Natural language query | ✓ ZespanPilot NLQ | Not available |
| Guardrails | ✓ 7 types, pre/post | Not available |
| Incident management | ✓ Full state machine | Not available |
| OpenTelemetry native | ✓ OTLP/HTTP endpoint | Partial |
Pick Zespan when…
- Your agents span multiple frameworks — CrewAI, AutoGen, Google ADK, custom.
- You want cost forecasting, AI optimization recommendations, and anomaly detection.
- You need guardrails, PII redaction, or runtime safety in production.
- You want an AI copilot (ZespanPilot) for querying observability data in plain English.
- You're evaluating at the team/org level and don't want per-seat pricing.
Pick LangSmith when…
- Your stack is 100% LangChain or LangGraph and you want the deepest native integration.
- You want LangGraph state diffs between graph nodes — LangSmith's unique differentiator.
- Your team already has LangSmith in its workflow and switching cost outweighs the gaps.
Frequently asked
Does Zespan support LangChain?
Yes. Zespan ships a drop-in LumiqCallbackHandler for LangChain and LangChain.js. It traces every chain step, agent reasoning, and tool call — the same way LangSmith does, but with the full Zespan feature set on top.
How does Zespan handle multi-framework teams?
Zespan supports LangChain, CrewAI, AutoGen, Google ADK, LlamaIndex, Vercel AI SDK, and PydanticAI out of the box — plus any OpenTelemetry-instrumented framework via the native OTLP/HTTP endpoint. One dashboard for your whole agent stack.
Is Zespan more expensive than LangSmith?
LangSmith starts at $39/seat/month. Zespan starts at $39/month flat for the Solo plan (one seat). For teams of 3+, Zespan's Pro plan at $149/month (10 seats) is typically cheaper than LangSmith's per-seat model.
Can I migrate from LangSmith to Zespan?
Yes. Replace LangSmith's callback or OTEL exporter with Zespan's drop-in equivalent. For LangChain apps, swap LangSmithTracer for LumiqCallbackHandler. Setup takes under 5 minutes.
Try Zespan — free, no card needed
10K traces/month free. Setup takes under 5 minutes. See why teams switch from LangSmith.
Get started free →