Use Case — Multi-Agent

See every handoff, tool call, and planning step across your agent system.

When an orchestrator delegates to sub-agents, when a ReAct loop stalls, when a tool call errors silently — you need to know exactly where. Here's how Zespan shows you.

Start free →For Engineering teams building agent orchestration

The problem

01

Attribution is impossible

One user request spawns an orchestrator, three sub-agents, and twelve tool calls. When something fails, you can't tell which agent in the chain caused it.

02

Cost is invisible per agent

You see total LLM spend but can't attribute it to specific agents or roles. One expensive agent can silently drive up costs with no signal.

03

Quality degrades without warning

A sub-agent starts returning lower-quality outputs. No eval coverage means you find out from a user complaint days later.

How Zespan helps

1

Every agent in the chain is identified, not just the one that answered

The moment an orchestrator delegates to a sub-agent, Zespan knows both exist — name, role, and framework, detected automatically from the call itself. When something fails three hops into a delegation chain, you're not starting from 'which of our twelve agents touched this.' You already know.

zespan.com
Zespan Agent Registry showing auto-discovered agents with framework, role, call count, and cost
2

A slow or broken handoff is visible as one edge in the graph, not buried in a log

Every delegation is drawn as an edge between agents, with cost and latency attached to that specific hop. A sub-agent that's quietly adding two seconds to every request isn't a mystery you debug by reading logs line by line — it's the one long edge in the graph.

zespan.com
Zespan delegation graph showing multi-agent handoff chain with cost and latency per edge
3

One agent's contribution to a failure is isolated, not blended into the whole request

A failing or slow trace breaks down into every planning step, LLM call, and tool invocation as its own timed span. Filtering by a single agent's spans across thousands of traces tells you whether the problem is that one agent, or something upstream feeding it bad input.

zespan.com
Zespan span waterfall showing multi-agent trace with per-span cost and latency breakdown
4

A degrading sub-agent shows up as a trend, before it becomes an incident

Every agent carries a composite health score weighted by error rate, cost trend, and eval pass rate. A sub-agent sliding from healthy to degraded over a week is visible as that trend, not discovered the day it finally breaks something downstream.

zespan.com
Zespan agent health dashboard showing composite scores, grades, and per-signal breakdown
5

Degradation pages your team, instead of waiting for a user to notice

An alert on a specific agent's error rate or health score means a failing orchestrator gets caught by Slack or PagerDuty, on your terms, instead of by the support queue on someone else's.

Start free — 50K traces/month, no card needed

See every agent decision, tool call, and handoff in production. Setup takes a few minutes.

Start free →